远端埋没真皮缝合技术对儿童手术切口瘢痕的影响The effect of set-back buried dermal suture technique on pediatric incision scar
朱悦悦;蔡凯旋;刘威;杨骏逸;殷炜;朱振洪;
摘要(Abstract)：
目的 评价远端埋没真皮缝合技术对儿童烧伤整形外科择期手术切口瘢痕的影响。方法 收集2021年1月1日-2021年8月31日在苏州大学附属儿童医院住院择期手术中的梭形创面患儿的创面及临床资料共计101例，按照切口缝合方法分为对照组（n=49）和试验组（n=52），在关闭皮下及真皮层时对照组采用传统真皮内埋没缝合（buried intradermal suture,BIS），试验组采用远端埋没真皮缝合技术（set-back buried dermal suture,SBDS）。于术中量取创面大小，观察两组患儿术后即刻切口外观特点以及术后半年的瘢痕严重程度，以患者和观察者瘢痕评分量表（Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale,POSAS）评分和瘢痕宽度对两组患儿术后半年瘢痕严重程度进行比较。结果 (1)试验组术后即刻切缘外翻高度值平均0.23(0.2-0.5)cm，切缘隆起可在平均8(3-36)周变平坦，对照组术毕切缘与周围皮肤在同一水平。(2)术后半年切口瘢痕POSAS评分及宽度试验组优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 远端埋没真皮缝合技术可通过一定程度的切缘外翻改善手术切口瘢痕。
关键词(KeyWords)： 远端埋没真皮缝合;瘢痕;儿童;患者和观察者瘢痕评分量表
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Authors): 朱悦悦;蔡凯旋;刘威;杨骏逸;殷炜;朱振洪;
DOI: 10.19593/j.issn.2095-0721.2023.01.002
参考文献(References)：
- [1] Barnes LA, Marshall CD, Leavitt T, et al. Mechanical Forces in Cutaneous Wound Healing:Emerging Therapies to Minimize Scar Formation.[J].Adv Wound Care(New Rochelle). 2018. 7(2):47-56. 10.1089/wound.2016.0709
- [2] Zhao QN, Zhou YM, Sun CY. Research advances on the effect of mechanical tension in post-traumatic hypertrophic scar formation.[J].ZhongHua ShaoShang ZaZhi. 2021. 37(6):586-590. 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200315-00167
- [3] Joo JS, Zhuang AR, Tchanque-Fossuo C, et al. Dermal suture only versus layered closure:A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial.[J].J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. 81(6):1346-1352. 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.040
- [4] Kantor J. The set-back buried dermal suture:an alternative to the buried vertical mattress for layered wound closure.[J].J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010. 62(2):351-3. 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.05.049
- [5] Zhang W, Xie J, Zeng A. The Origin and Development of Interrupted Subcuticular Suture:An Important Technique for Achieving Optimum Wound Closure.[J]. Dermatol Surg. 2022.48(6):619-624. 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003437
- [6] Draaijers Lieneke J,Tempelman Fenike R H,Botman Yvonne A M et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale:a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.[J].Plast Reconstr Surg, 2004, 113:1960-5; discussion 1966-7. 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56
- [7] Wang AS, Kleinerman R, Armstrong AW, et al. Set-back versus buried vertical mattress suturing:results of a randomized blinded trial.[J].J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015. 72(4):674-80. 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.018
- [8] Butzelaar L, Ulrich MM, Mink van der Molen AB, et al. Currently known risk factors for hypertrophic skin scarring:A review.[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016. 69(2):163-9. 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.015
- [9] Zhang X, Diao JS, Guo SZ, et al. Wedge-shaped excision and modified vertical mattress suture fully buried in a multilayered and tensioned wound closure.[J].Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009.33(3):457-60. 10.1007/s00266-009-9311-6
- [10] Yang XY, Zhou TT, Cao L. A simple positioning technique for set-back suture. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020. 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.031
- [11] Kantor J, Eisen DB, Dzubow LM. Buried dermal set-back suture placement:Considerations for optimizing long-term outcomes.[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022. 86(2):e85. 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.09.034
- [12] da Costa P, Echevarría-Guanilo ME, Gon?alves N, et al.Subjective Tools for Burn Scar Assessment:An Integrative Review.[J].Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021. 34(6):1-10.10.1097/01.ASW.0000749732.09228.a9
- [13] Liu X, Nelemans P J, Van Winden M, et al. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.[J].J EUR ACAD DERMATOL. 2017. 31(2). 10.1111/jdv.13805
- [14] Kimberly S, Clayton PJ, Lynne T, et al. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale When Used With Postsurgical Scar Photographs.[J].DERMATOL SURG. 201810.1097/DSS.0000000000001479
- [15] Kantor J. The running percutaneous set-back dermal suture.[J].J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015. 73(2):e57-8. 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.051
- [16] Kantor J. The running set-back dermal suture.[J].J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015. 72(6):e163-4. 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.045
- [17] Kantor J. The percutaneous set-back dermal suture.[J].J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015. 72(2):e61-2. 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.09.033